Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/16/2013 in all areas

  1. lol - Yep. All about me. But I could turn the same argument against the smokers. It's their right to stink the place up for everyone. Right? No prude or tobacco hater here. Shit - I've owned the stock! Helluva dividend. Light 'em up! Just don't do it where I have to work or eat/drink. Really, what I was arguing against was "smoke free" is "exactly the same" as mandatory helmet laws, which is utter bullshit. So...Once more, with feeling: Not wearing a helmet = stupid but no harm to anyone else. (Except maybe the insurance companies and the loved ones of the un-helmeted.) Smoking in public places = affects anyone nearby.
    1 point
  2. Whatever gets rid of those ridiculous handlebars is my vote.
    1 point
  3. chrome parts are getting blacked out. i hate chrome
    1 point
  4. Flat wrong. I don't have to share anybody's skull. They're free to splat it all over the road if they like and I have no part in it. I DO share the same air in public places. It sucked to come home from a bar or restaurant and have everything down to my shoes stink. And the "it's your choice" bit is epic fail. They're called public places for a reason.
    1 point
  5. I was shopping for helmets a couple weeks ago and came across an icon helmet I liked, the icon airmada with the chainbrain graphic. I was nervous about ordering a helmet online due to the fact I'm inbetween most helmet sizes. Nate answered all of the hundred some questions I asked him and helped me size the helmet. The price was way better than advertised and I doubt anyone can come close to the price riders discount is selling these for. I was pretty excited that when I put the helmet on it was snug but a perfect fit no pressure points or loose spots. I'm definitely glad these guys @ riders discount hook us up so well. Glad to have them around and will happily use them again. Thanks guys.
    1 point
  6. And that comment shows us the type of person you are
    1 point
  7. Impeachment is a non-issue. It doesn't remove them from office, and with him being a Democrat it will be quickly forgotten. Clinton was impeached yet stayed in office (you can't shame that level of narcissism). His disbarment was also quickly forgotten. Impeaching the Emporer wouldn't affect anything. Its a nice thought, but doesn't carry any weight.
    1 point
  8. My brother had the same thing. Hope all is well with your boy.
    1 point
  9. That's not an equal comparison. Sam, I've given close friends shit for the same thing in the past. Yeah, you make a few bucks, but in the long run you end up paying it right back because everybody thinks they are smart and plays the same game. The fucked up thing is, the people who get screwed over are the ones who don't inflate their claim and the people lucky enough to not be involved in an accident.
    1 point
  10. Good thing I'm not here seeking your approval. Anyone else who wants to judge me without even meeting me, feel free to do so. I know about 4 people on here, I've met a few more and rode with them and I get along with a few more than that. The rest of you can get fucked as far as I care. Bunch of trolls....
    0 points
  11. This sickens me beyond belief.... Sickness just begets more sickness. http://patdollard.com/2013/07/it-beg...s-homosexuals/ Emphasis Mine. Quote: Using the same tactics used by “gay” rights activists, pedophiles have begun to seek similar status arguing their desire for children is a sexual orientation no different than heterosexual or homosexuals. Critics of the homosexual lifestyle have long claimed that once it became acceptable to identify homosexuality as simply an “alternative lifestyle” or sexual orientation, logically nothing would be off limits. “Gay” advocates have taken offense at such a position insisting this would never happen. However, psychiatrists are now beginning to advocate redefining pedophilia in the same way homosexuality was redefined several years ago. In 1973 the American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality from its list of mental disorders. A group of psychiatrists with B4U-Act recently held a symposium proposing a new definition of pedophilia in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders of the APA. B4U-Act calls pedophiles “minor-attracted people.” The organization’s website states its purpose is to, “help mental health professionals learn more about attraction to minors and to consider the effects of stereotyping, stigma and fear.” In 1998 The APA issued a report claiming “that the ‘negative potential’ of adult sex with children was ‘overstated’ and that ‘the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from childhood sexual abuse experiences.” Pedophilia has already been granted protected status by the Federal Government. The Matthew Shephard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act lists “sexual orientation” as a protected class; however, it does not define the term. You would think they wanted to fix that loophole, right? No. Quote: Republicans attempted to add an amendment specifying that “pedophilia is not covered as an orientation;” however, the amendment was defeated by Democrats. Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fl) stated that all alternative sexual lifestyles should be protected under the law. “This bill addresses our resolve to end violence based on prejudice and to guarantee that all Americans, regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability or all of these ‘philias’ and fetishes and ‘isms’ that were put forward need not live in fear because of who they are. I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of this rule.” The White House praised the bill saying, “At root, this isn’t just about our laws; this is about who we are as a people. This is about whether we value one another – whether we embrace our differences rather than allowing them to become a source of animus.” Next
    -1 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...