VM host going down on a Friday night sucks.....
#1
Posted 19 November 2011 - 05:11 AM
Huge thanks to the following businesses who've donated towards my Pelotonia ride:
The M. Conley Company
#2
Posted 19 November 2011 - 06:13 AM
Determination and tactics will overcome advanced equipment and a lackluster desire.
#3
Posted 19 November 2011 - 06:36 AM
Huge thanks to the following businesses who've donated towards my Pelotonia ride:
The M. Conley Company
#4
Posted 19 November 2011 - 06:38 AM
Binary logs not flushed to disk before the host kicks the bucket sucks worse.
Your saying something happened to the vCenter database?
#5
Posted 19 November 2011 - 06:40 AM
Honestly, I'm becoming less and less of a fan of VM.
I get that feeling too. But the alternatives don't give me warm fuzzies either... I'm not going to trust MS to do it. Virtualbox?
#7
Posted 19 November 2011 - 03:16 PM
The VMs did come back up on another host, but there was a couple minutes of downtime and the servers reacted as if they'd lost power. With databases, the big problem is what's in cache and hasn't been written to disk yet. That data is lost. That normally isn't too big of an issue as you're talking milliseconds of data. However, I use MySQL master-slave replication. What was in the cache hadn't been written to the binary logs. This can be fixed by a simple reset master/reset slave, but this has to be done before it's brought back online. The HA failover automatically brought the VM and MySQL back online when it rolled it over to the other host. This essentially broke the replication, forcing me to have to start over and rebuild the slave and resync the replication. This isn't the vCenter database. This is our webapps database server.Shouldn't HA or FT kick the vmachines over to another host? Throw that host in the dumpster, slap in your stand-by, vicfg-cfgbackup -l C:\<backup.txt> your saved config back into the new host, go home and sleep. lol
Your saying something happened to the vCenter database?
I'm just not a fan of the cloud or virtual database servers. I can see where there's huge advantages to VM, but as a whole for databases I'd much rather have a physical cluster.I get that feeling too. But the alternatives don't give me warm fuzzies either... I'm not going to trust MS to do it. Virtualbox?
I don't know much/anything about the backend of VM. I'm a database junky. Sorry dude.Hey Casper, Do you know how you guys are configuring your vSwitches? I'm a bit confused on a topic..
Huge thanks to the following businesses who've donated towards my Pelotonia ride:
The M. Conley Company
#9
Posted 19 November 2011 - 03:33 PM
Past bikes: 1968 Honda CB350, 1978 CB750, 1980 CX500, 1981 CX500, 1981 GL500, 1981 Yamaha Virago XV750, 1982 XV750, 1984 Honda VFR750, 1984 NightHawk 700, 1998 VTR1000, 2003 Suzuki GS500.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users















