Jump to content

kawasaki to release "ground breaking" ninja h2.


cOoTeR
 Share

Recommended Posts

So the rumors are flying all over about this one. Saying it'll be any thing from a 500 cc to a supercharged 1500 cc. But the teaser videos at www.ninja-h2.com sounds like there could be a supercharger.

http://www.roadracingworld.com/news/kawasaki-to-introduce-ninja-h2-sept-30-in-germany/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the rumors are flying all over about this one. Saying it'll be any thing from a 500 cc to a supercharged 1500 cc. But the teaser videos at www.ninja-h2.com sounds like there could be a supercharger.

http://www.roadracingworld.com/news/kawasaki-to-introduce-ninja-h2-sept-30-in-germany/

 

That sounds like a turbo and blow-off valve to me.... If I had to guess, I'd say smaller displacement (500-800cc) turbo pushing more power than the ZX10 and lighter. Just my guess. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kawi unveiled a supercharged zx14 motor earlier this year, so new zx14 supercharged death rocket???

 

 

http://www.motorcycle-usa.com/630/17479/Motorcycle-Article/Kawasaki-Supercharged-Inline-Four-at-Tokyo.aspx

 

I wanna ride it.

Edited by tweak740
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess kawasaki has several patents about super chargers. Including a variable speed super charger that appears to have a small 2 speed "transmission". What ever it is I hope it lives up to the hype. I'm pretty sure they already have a 250 hp + supercharged jet ski. If they've developed that into a street bike it'll be a game changer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mmmmm. Definitely sounded like forced induction in the 6-8 second segment. The remainder of the video almost sounds like an electric motor.... The chirping is definitely not a blow off valve. At least not any of the kind I am familiar with. I highly doubt that. It could very well still be a farce induction setup. The chirp may be a secondary electric motor used to keep the crank spinning at speed like in this article. Maybe a more developed version?

http://www.gizmag.com/2011-kawasaki-zx-10r-zx10r-ninja-photos-video/15655/

But I hear 4 cylinders there. Sad face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The interwebs says it's a 636-based engine with a turbo.  Bore and stroke the 636 a tad, and a turbo or supercharged 750 I-4 sounds like a pretty good guess.  that would be liter bike power with a lot less weight.   

 

Could be pretty cool, but I'm not sure where it will fit in.   This is being touted as a "flagship" sportbike, so more expensive than the ZX10?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The interwebs says it's a 636-based engine with a turbo.  Bore and stroke the 636 a tad, and a turbo or supercharged 750 I-4 sounds like a pretty good guess.  that would be liter bike power with a lot less weight.   

 

Could be pretty cool, but I'm not sure where it will fit in.   This is being touted as a "flagship" sportbike, so more expensive than the ZX10?

Here's the problem with the small displacement theory. The 2015 zx-10rabs weighs 443 lbs, the 2015 zx-6rabs weighs 228. 15 lb difference which I agree is a lot on a sport bike. But add a supercharger and most likely a bigger tire and the weight difference is greatly reduced. I don't see kawasaki wasting engineering and development time to make 1000cc power out of a chassis that only weighs 10 lbs less and call it their flagship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the problem with the small displacement theory. The 2015 zx-10rabs weighs 443 lbs, the 2015 zx-6rabs weighs 228. 15 lb difference which I agree is a lot on a sport bike. But add a supercharger and most likely a bigger tire and the weight difference is greatly reduced. I don't see kawasaki wasting engineering and development time to make 1000cc power out of a chassis that only weighs 10 lbs less and call it their flagship.

I agree.  If Kaw is going though all the engineering gyrations to make a supercharged motorcycle they are going to make a horsepower statement.  It will be at least 1000cc.   Maybe much bigger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm basing my guess (and I admit is purely that) on the articles claiming they have info that the engine is based on the 636, and the fact that the last H2 (the mach IV) was a 750 two-stroke triple.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kawasaki_H2_Mach_IV

 

 

If this ends up being a turbo triple on a completely new engine block, that would indeed be a lot of engineering...  If it's a 2-stroke, I'll shit myself :p

Edited by redkow97
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...